<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 614 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441635</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the disallowance of the cenvat credit availed by the appellant on invoices not addressed to the registered premises. However, the Tribunal set aside the denial of Cenvat Credit, allowing the appeal, emphasizing that denial based on procedural lapses or curable defects in the invoices was not justified as long as the input services were received, utilized, and properly accounted for.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 614 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441635</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the disallowance of the cenvat credit availed by the appellant on invoices not addressed to the registered premises. However, the Tribunal set aside the denial of Cenvat Credit, allowing the appeal, emphasizing that denial based on procedural lapses or curable defects in the invoices was not justified as long as the input services were received, utilized, and properly accounted for.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>