<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 605 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration based on judgments passed after the original order. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Adjudicating Authority directed to pass a denovo order within two months from the date of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 605 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration based on judgments passed after the original order. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Adjudicating Authority directed to pass a denovo order within two months from the date of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>