<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 591 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441612</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the Tribunal to reexamine whether the amount of Rs. 17,61,99,672/- represented an ascertained liability for provision of liquidated damages. The Tribunal was directed to determine this based on the existing record and to dispose of the matter within eight weeks. Both parties agreed to the remand, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 591 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441612</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the Tribunal to reexamine whether the amount of Rs. 17,61,99,672/- represented an ascertained liability for provision of liquidated damages. The Tribunal was directed to determine this based on the existing record and to dispose of the matter within eight weeks. Both parties agreed to the remand, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>