<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 589 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441610</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized that without fresh material for reassessment and considering the legal principle that penalty imposition requires a valid basis, the penalty was deemed untenable. The Cross Objection by the assessee, supporting the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 589 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441610</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized that without fresh material for reassessment and considering the legal principle that penalty imposition requires a valid basis, the penalty was deemed untenable. The Cross Objection by the assessee, supporting the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>