<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 1061 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309121</link>
    <description>Related-witness testimony can sustain a conviction when it is otherwise trustworthy, consistent and corroborated by medical evidence; relationship with the deceased does not by itself render such evidence unsafe. Here, the ocular account was supported by medical evidence of a gunshot injury, and the absence of strong motive did not displace the direct evidence. In an appeal against acquittal, reversal is permissible where the trial court&#039;s view is unreasonable or perverse; the High Court&#039;s reappreciation of evidence was justified because the acquittal view was not a reasonable one. The convictions were upheld and the appeals were rejected on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:07:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 1061 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309121</link>
      <description>Related-witness testimony can sustain a conviction when it is otherwise trustworthy, consistent and corroborated by medical evidence; relationship with the deceased does not by itself render such evidence unsafe. Here, the ocular account was supported by medical evidence of a gunshot injury, and the absence of strong motive did not displace the direct evidence. In an appeal against acquittal, reversal is permissible where the trial court&#039;s view is unreasonable or perverse; the High Court&#039;s reappreciation of evidence was justified because the acquittal view was not a reasonable one. The convictions were upheld and the appeals were rejected on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>