<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1213 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309119</link>
    <description>An appellate court will interfere with an acquittal only in exceptional cases where the judgment is perverse or compelling circumstances exist, because the presumption of innocence is strengthened after acquittal. Applying that standard, the SC found the High Court&#039;s view to be a plausible appreciation of the evidence, supported by material contradictions, inconsistencies in the FIR and investigation, doubts about the place and manner of occurrence, absence of reliable eye-witness support, and failure to explain injuries on the accused. The acquittal was therefore upheld and the prosecution challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:05:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1213 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309119</link>
      <description>An appellate court will interfere with an acquittal only in exceptional cases where the judgment is perverse or compelling circumstances exist, because the presumption of innocence is strengthened after acquittal. Applying that standard, the SC found the High Court&#039;s view to be a plausible appreciation of the evidence, supported by material contradictions, inconsistencies in the FIR and investigation, doubts about the place and manner of occurrence, absence of reliable eye-witness support, and failure to explain injuries on the accused. The acquittal was therefore upheld and the prosecution challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>