<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 259 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33609</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s recording in the assessment order fulfilled the requirement for initiating penalty proceedings, and the Tribunal erred in concluding otherwise. The matter was remitted for a decision on the merits, directing the parties to appear before the Tribunal for further directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 259 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33609</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s recording in the assessment order fulfilled the requirement for initiating penalty proceedings, and the Tribunal erred in concluding otherwise. The matter was remitted for a decision on the merits, directing the parties to appear before the Tribunal for further directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>