<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 575 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441596</link>
    <description>Sealing of property was challenged and inspection with de-sealing was sought. The Madras High Court directed the respondents to inspect the property in the petitioner&#039;s presence and to de-seal it by the specified date, with the petitioner required to cooperate during the inspection. The operative effect is that the dispute was resolved through a time-bound inspection and de-sealing direction rather than further restraint on the property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 575 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441596</link>
      <description>Sealing of property was challenged and inspection with de-sealing was sought. The Madras High Court directed the respondents to inspect the property in the petitioner&#039;s presence and to de-seal it by the specified date, with the petitioner required to cooperate during the inspection. The operative effect is that the dispute was resolved through a time-bound inspection and de-sealing direction rather than further restraint on the property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>