https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441590 Where an appellate authority had permitted rectification of a BIS labelling defect under customs supervision and declined to sustain redemption fine and penalty, customs officials could not insist on payment of those amounts as a condition for clearance. Requiring prepayment would effectively amount to staying the appellate order, even though no stay had been obtained. The Bombay High Court directed implementation of the appellate order and permitted clearance of the goods after compliance with the prescribed labelling requirement. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:17:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441590 Where an appellate authority had permitted rectification of a BIS labelling defect under customs supervision and declined to sustain redemption fine and penalty, customs officials could not insist on payment of those amounts as a condition for clearance. Requiring prepayment would effectively amount to staying the appellate order, even though no stay had been obtained. The Bombay High Court directed implementation of the appellate order and permitted clearance of the goods after compliance with the prescribed labelling requirement. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441590