<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 546 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441567</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal upheld the commercial decisions of the CoC. The Tribunal found no errors in the project-wise CIRP, the disqualification of the consortium under Section 29A, or the charging of penal interest by Kotak Bank. The Tribunal also noted that being an MSME did not entitle the Appellant to preferential treatment in the resolution process. The appeal was rejected, and all related applications were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 546 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441567</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal upheld the commercial decisions of the CoC. The Tribunal found no errors in the project-wise CIRP, the disqualification of the consortium under Section 29A, or the charging of penal interest by Kotak Bank. The Tribunal also noted that being an MSME did not entitle the Appellant to preferential treatment in the resolution process. The appeal was rejected, and all related applications were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>