<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 537 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441558</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, confirming the service tax already paid and setting aside penalties. The demand for interest for the extended period was deemed unsustainable, but the appellants were directed to pay interest within the limitation period. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 537 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441558</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, confirming the service tax already paid and setting aside penalties. The demand for interest for the extended period was deemed unsustainable, but the appellants were directed to pay interest within the limitation period. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>