https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441549 A cheque dishonour complaint was maintainable where the complainant carried on business as the sole proprietor of the concern in whose name the cheque was issued. The dishonour, statutory notice, and failure to pay within the prescribed time were proved, and no evidence rebutted the complainant's proprietary status. On that basis, the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts disclosed no legal infirmity, and revisional interference was held unwarranted in the Section 138 prosecution. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441549 A cheque dishonour complaint was maintainable where the complainant carried on business as the sole proprietor of the concern in whose name the cheque was issued. The dishonour, statutory notice, and failure to pay within the prescribed time were proved, and no evidence rebutted the complainant's proprietary status. On that basis, the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts disclosed no legal infirmity, and revisional interference was held unwarranted in the Section 138 prosecution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441549