https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441548 Interference with an acquittal is unwarranted where the trial court has taken a possible view based on evidence, and its findings are neither perverse nor patently illegal; on that basis, leave to appeal was refused. A cheque dishonour prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails if the cheque is presented beyond its validity period; here, the cheque was dated 11.02.2015 and the complainant's own version showed presentation after the expiry of three months, so the statutory requirement was not met. The acquittal was therefore sustained because the evidence supported the trial court's assessment and no offence was made out. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:14:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441548 Interference with an acquittal is unwarranted where the trial court has taken a possible view based on evidence, and its findings are neither perverse nor patently illegal; on that basis, leave to appeal was refused. A cheque dishonour prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails if the cheque is presented beyond its validity period; here, the cheque was dated 11.02.2015 and the complainant's own version showed presentation after the expiry of three months, so the statutory requirement was not met. The acquittal was therefore sustained because the evidence supported the trial court's assessment and no offence was made out. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441548