<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33600</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order summoning the accused petitioners to face trial and dismissed the criminal complaint under section 276B of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1983-84. The court found that no offense was committed as the tax deduction at source was required at the time of making payment to the payee, not when credited, as per the legislative provisions in force during that year. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with the specific legal requirements applicable at the relevant time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33600</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order summoning the accused petitioners to face trial and dismissed the criminal complaint under section 276B of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1983-84. The court found that no offense was committed as the tax deduction at source was required at the time of making payment to the payee, not when credited, as per the legislative provisions in force during that year. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with the specific legal requirements applicable at the relevant time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>