https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309104 A lawyer's contemptuous act of hurling a shoe at a Judge was treated as highly unbecoming and gravely reprehensible, but the Supreme Court gave weight to his unconditional apology and expressed remorse. In view of that contrition and the surrounding circumstances, the Court held that a lengthy custodial sentence was unnecessary, while still marking the misconduct with serious censure. The sentence was reduced from six months' simple imprisonment to one month, and the fine was enhanced. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2024 16:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309104 A lawyer's contemptuous act of hurling a shoe at a Judge was treated as highly unbecoming and gravely reprehensible, but the Supreme Court gave weight to his unconditional apology and expressed remorse. In view of that contrition and the surrounding circumstances, the Court held that a lengthy custodial sentence was unnecessary, while still marking the misconduct with serious censure. The sentence was reduced from six months' simple imprisonment to one month, and the fine was enhanced. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309104