https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309102 The court dismissed the appeal as the complainant failed to prove that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt. The inconsistencies in the complainant's evidence and the accused's plausible defense led to the rejection of the appeal. The court highlighted the necessity for a credible factual basis to invoke the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. en-us Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:58:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309102 The court dismissed the appeal as the complainant failed to prove that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt. The inconsistencies in the complainant's evidence and the accused's plausible defense led to the rejection of the appeal. The court highlighted the necessity for a credible factual basis to invoke the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309102