<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 140 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33599</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee for a fine paid to the Excise Department for belated payment of excise duty instalment. The Court considered the payment as a legitimate business expense, akin to compensation rather than a penalty for breach of law, following the principle that such payments should be allowed as expenditures regardless of labeling. The Court distinguished between penalties for breach of law and compensatory fines, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and disposing of the reference in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 140 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33599</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee for a fine paid to the Excise Department for belated payment of excise duty instalment. The Court considered the payment as a legitimate business expense, akin to compensation rather than a penalty for breach of law, following the principle that such payments should be allowed as expenditures regardless of labeling. The Court distinguished between penalties for breach of law and compensatory fines, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and disposing of the reference in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>