https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441544 The HC directed the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to reexamine whether the petitioner, as the registered vehicle owner, connived with the transporter to evade tax under Sections 129 or 130 of the CGST/KGST Act. The confiscation order dated 17.04.2021 is stayed pending this inquiry. The petitioner must be given an opportunity to respond to the material relied upon, including any deliberate withholding of information. The petitioner is required to appear before the authority on 13.03.2023 for further proceedings. en-us Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Aug 2025 13:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441544 The HC directed the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to reexamine whether the petitioner, as the registered vehicle owner, connived with the transporter to evade tax under Sections 129 or 130 of the CGST/KGST Act. The confiscation order dated 17.04.2021 is stayed pending this inquiry. The petitioner must be given an opportunity to respond to the material relied upon, including any deliberate withholding of information. The petitioner is required to appear before the authority on 13.03.2023 for further proceedings. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441544