<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 520 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441541</link>
    <description>The HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, as the assessment was concluded and unabated, with no incriminating material found during the search. The appeal was dismissed, confirming that no substantial question of law was involved, aligning with precedents like CIT Vs. Kabul Chawla.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 520 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441541</link>
      <description>The HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, as the assessment was concluded and unabated, with no incriminating material found during the search. The appeal was dismissed, confirming that no substantial question of law was involved, aligning with precedents like CIT Vs. Kabul Chawla.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>