<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 506 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the penalty order imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal held that since the addition to income, which was the basis for the penalty, had been deleted in the quantum proceedings, the penalty was not sustainable. Therefore, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The decision was pronounced on 7th August 2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:58:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 506 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the penalty order imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal held that since the addition to income, which was the basis for the penalty, had been deleted in the quantum proceedings, the penalty was not sustainable. Therefore, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The decision was pronounced on 7th August 2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>