https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441514 The High Court affirmed the Trial Court's decision in O.S.No.236 of 2009, upholding that the appellant purchased properties in the name of his third wife for her benefit. The 2nd defendant's acquisition during the suit was deemed not bona fide under the Doctrine of lis pendens. The Appeal Suit in A.S.No.162 of 2017 was dismissed, with no costs awarded, confirming the judgment and decree of the District Court dated 03.01.2017. en-us Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Aug 2023 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441514 The High Court affirmed the Trial Court's decision in O.S.No.236 of 2009, upholding that the appellant purchased properties in the name of his third wife for her benefit. The 2nd defendant's acquisition during the suit was deemed not bona fide under the Doctrine of lis pendens. The Appeal Suit in A.S.No.162 of 2017 was dismissed, with no costs awarded, confirming the judgment and decree of the District Court dated 03.01.2017. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441514