<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 473 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that penal interest and bounce charges collected by the appellants are not subject to service tax under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. The charges were deemed to be compensation for breach of contract or penalties, not consideration for tolerating an act. The appeals by the appellants were allowed, and the previous order was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 473 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that penal interest and bounce charges collected by the appellants are not subject to service tax under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. The charges were deemed to be compensation for breach of contract or penalties, not consideration for tolerating an act. The appeals by the appellants were allowed, and the previous order was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>