https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441486 A withdrawn charge memo does not automatically extinguish disciplinary proceedings where the withdrawal is for a technical defect and a fresh memo is issued on the same misconduct as a continuation of the earlier proceeding. On the facts, the second charge memo followed without any gap, so the proceedings were treated as pending on the relevant date. Since pendency of Rule 17(b) disciplinary proceedings disentitled the employee from consideration for promotion under the applicable guidelines, denial of inclusion in the promotion panel and consequential promotion was upheld. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441486 A withdrawn charge memo does not automatically extinguish disciplinary proceedings where the withdrawal is for a technical defect and a fresh memo is issued on the same misconduct as a continuation of the earlier proceeding. On the facts, the second charge memo followed without any gap, so the proceedings were treated as pending on the relevant date. Since pendency of Rule 17(b) disciplinary proceedings disentitled the employee from consideration for promotion under the applicable guidelines, denial of inclusion in the promotion panel and consequential promotion was upheld. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441486