<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1986 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309087</link>
    <description>A Section 65B certificate is required only when electronic record evidence is tendered at trial, not as a condition precedent at the charge-sheet stage, so prosecution cannot be quashed for its absence at that stage. Use of a spy camera during a preliminary corruption inquiry before FIR registration was treated as permissible verification, distinct from formal investigation, and did not vitiate the case. At the discharge stage, the court must only see whether the material discloses the offence and cannot conduct a mini trial; on that standard, discharge was unwarranted and the criminal proceedings were allowed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:32:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1986 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309087</link>
      <description>A Section 65B certificate is required only when electronic record evidence is tendered at trial, not as a condition precedent at the charge-sheet stage, so prosecution cannot be quashed for its absence at that stage. Use of a spy camera during a preliminary corruption inquiry before FIR registration was treated as permissible verification, distinct from formal investigation, and did not vitiate the case. At the discharge stage, the court must only see whether the material discloses the offence and cannot conduct a mini trial; on that standard, discharge was unwarranted and the criminal proceedings were allowed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>