<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 26 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33586</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the classification of the amount received by a public sector cooperative sugar mill as a revenue receipt, in line with the interpretation of the Incentive Scheme and previous legal precedents. The Court dismissed the appeal, citing consistency with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling on the revenue character of subsidies received, and found no new legal question to be addressed in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 26 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33586</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the classification of the amount received by a public sector cooperative sugar mill as a revenue receipt, in line with the interpretation of the Incentive Scheme and previous legal precedents. The Court dismissed the appeal, citing consistency with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling on the revenue character of subsidies received, and found no new legal question to be addressed in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>