<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1346 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309071</link>
    <description>Statutory deemed consent under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 accrues when a complete application remains undecided beyond the prescribed four-month period and is not refused in time. A later attempt to sustain refusal on a new ground of incompleteness was not accepted, and the appellate finding on limitation was treated as erroneous. Environmental objections also could not justify outright refusal without a Rule 5 notification for the alleged sensitive area and a real, non-negligible risk on the record. The board could still regulate the project by imposing conditions and safeguards rather than denying consent altogether.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 17:23:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1346 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309071</link>
      <description>Statutory deemed consent under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 accrues when a complete application remains undecided beyond the prescribed four-month period and is not refused in time. A later attempt to sustain refusal on a new ground of incompleteness was not accepted, and the appellate finding on limitation was treated as erroneous. Environmental objections also could not justify outright refusal without a Rule 5 notification for the alleged sensitive area and a real, non-negligible risk on the record. The board could still regulate the project by imposing conditions and safeguards rather than denying consent altogether.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>