<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1220 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309068</link>
    <description>In corruption matters, Section 482 CrPC should be exercised sparingly and not to quash proceedings where the complaint and investigation material disclose a prima facie offence. The complaint, taped conversation, recovery of tainted currency, positive hand-wash and surrounding circumstances were treated as sufficient prima facie material of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification. Statements recorded during investigation and later affidavits could not be used at that stage to conclusively negate the prosecution case. The quashing order was set aside and the prosecution was allowed to continue, leaving the evidence to be tested at trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1220 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309068</link>
      <description>In corruption matters, Section 482 CrPC should be exercised sparingly and not to quash proceedings where the complaint and investigation material disclose a prima facie offence. The complaint, taped conversation, recovery of tainted currency, positive hand-wash and surrounding circumstances were treated as sufficient prima facie material of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification. Statements recorded during investigation and later affidavits could not be used at that stage to conclusively negate the prosecution case. The quashing order was set aside and the prosecution was allowed to continue, leaving the evidence to be tested at trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>