<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 693 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309061</link>
    <description>A registered sale deed ordinarily supports mutation in the revenue record, and revenue entries are only fiscal in nature without conferring title. The Gujarat HC noted that revenue authorities cannot conclusively decide the validity of a transaction under another enactment or adjudicate disputes reserved for the competent civil forum. Where a prima facie objection exists and civil proceedings are pending, the proper course is to retain the mutation entry with an express qualification that it remains subject to the outcome of those proceedings. The cancellation of the mutation entries in toto was therefore not justified, and the entries were directed to continue with that clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 11:10:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 693 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309061</link>
      <description>A registered sale deed ordinarily supports mutation in the revenue record, and revenue entries are only fiscal in nature without conferring title. The Gujarat HC noted that revenue authorities cannot conclusively decide the validity of a transaction under another enactment or adjudicate disputes reserved for the competent civil forum. Where a prima facie objection exists and civil proceedings are pending, the proper course is to retain the mutation entry with an express qualification that it remains subject to the outcome of those proceedings. The cancellation of the mutation entries in toto was therefore not justified, and the entries were directed to continue with that clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>