<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee-company&#039;s cash deposit during demonetization upheld; Section 69A allegations of improper cash retention dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71392</link>
    <description>Addition of deposit into bank during demonetization period u/s 69A - The amount was kept by assessee-company for meeting the requirement of expenses and contingency as per policy of company as depict from above and allegation of AO for keeping cash over a long period is not correct as mention in the Assessment order. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:53:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee-company&#039;s cash deposit during demonetization upheld; Section 69A allegations of improper cash retention dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71392</link>
      <description>Addition of deposit into bank during demonetization period u/s 69A - The amount was kept by assessee-company for meeting the requirement of expenses and contingency as per policy of company as depict from above and allegation of AO for keeping cash over a long period is not correct as mention in the Assessment order. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:53:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>