<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 458 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441479</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Assessee, finding the Tribunal&#039;s decision inconsistent with its previous rulings. The Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the aggregation approach and its separate benchmarking of royalty payments contradicted established methodologies. The court concluded that the Tribunal misapplied case law and should have adhered to the TNMM method for all transactions, allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 458 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441479</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Assessee, finding the Tribunal&#039;s decision inconsistent with its previous rulings. The Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the aggregation approach and its separate benchmarking of royalty payments contradicted established methodologies. The court concluded that the Tribunal misapplied case law and should have adhered to the TNMM method for all transactions, allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>