<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 456 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441477</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee. It concluded that payments to distributors did not constitute commission under section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the relationship was Principal to Principal, not Principal to Agent. Consequently, the assessee was not liable for tax deduction on these payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 456 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441477</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee. It concluded that payments to distributors did not constitute commission under section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the relationship was Principal to Principal, not Principal to Agent. Consequently, the assessee was not liable for tax deduction on these payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>