<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 450 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing &quot;sufficient cause&quot; and referencing relevant case law. The challenge to the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer was dismissed due to the failure to raise objections timely. The addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was set aside as the genuineness of the gift was adequately explained. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal on merits and pronounced the order on 04/08/2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 450 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing &quot;sufficient cause&quot; and referencing relevant case law. The challenge to the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer was dismissed due to the failure to raise objections timely. The addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was set aside as the genuineness of the gift was adequately explained. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal on merits and pronounced the order on 04/08/2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>