<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 153 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33580</link>
    <description>The court set aside the dismissal orders and directed the restoration of the revision petitions for assessment years 1978-79 and 1980-81. The revisional authority was instructed to consider the petitions on their merits without regard to the limitation period. The court emphasized that the delay in filing the petitions was justified due to circumstances beyond the appellant&#039;s control, specifically citing the misplaced application in the court registry. The writ appeals were allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 153 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33580</link>
      <description>The court set aside the dismissal orders and directed the restoration of the revision petitions for assessment years 1978-79 and 1980-81. The revisional authority was instructed to consider the petitions on their merits without regard to the limitation period. The court emphasized that the delay in filing the petitions was justified due to circumstances beyond the appellant&#039;s control, specifically citing the misplaced application in the court registry. The writ appeals were allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>