<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 439 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment as it was beyond four years and there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the reassessment was deemed invalid. The Tribunal did not adjudicate the issues on merits due to the quashing of the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 07:34:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 439 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment as it was beyond four years and there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the reassessment was deemed invalid. The Tribunal did not adjudicate the issues on merits due to the quashing of the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>