<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the fabrication charges received did not qualify as &#039;fees for technical services&#039;, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 15,75,67,856. Consequently, issues regarding the tax rate and interest under section 234B were deemed academic and dismissed as infructuous. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, aligning with previous judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the fabrication charges received did not qualify as &#039;fees for technical services&#039;, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 15,75,67,856. Consequently, issues regarding the tax rate and interest under section 234B were deemed academic and dismissed as infructuous. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, aligning with previous judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>