<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441445</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application, citing the applicant&#039;s non-appearance before the DRI and the lack of a real apprehension of arrest. The court held that the applicant&#039;s conduct and the absence of any proposal for his arrest by the DRI disentitled him from seeking anticipatory bail. The court clarified that its observations did not reflect on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 07:32:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441445</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application, citing the applicant&#039;s non-appearance before the DRI and the lack of a real apprehension of arrest. The court held that the applicant&#039;s conduct and the absence of any proposal for his arrest by the DRI disentitled him from seeking anticipatory bail. The court clarified that its observations did not reflect on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>