<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 417 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441438</link>
    <description>Customs tariff classification of imported scientific instruments turned on their actual function and the evidence on record. The spectrophotometer was held to measure colour properties in the optical range, and the twin vision scanner was treated as capturing spectral composition and converting colour data into digital form, so the importer&#039;s classification was upheld and the residual objection under Chapter Note 5(E) was rejected. The analyzer mastersizer was accepted as laboratory equipment used for particle-size measurement and analysis, so classification under the residual heading was set aside in favour of the specific heading. The governing principle stated that a specific tariff description prevails over a residual entry when the goods squarely fit that description.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 22:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 417 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441438</link>
      <description>Customs tariff classification of imported scientific instruments turned on their actual function and the evidence on record. The spectrophotometer was held to measure colour properties in the optical range, and the twin vision scanner was treated as capturing spectral composition and converting colour data into digital form, so the importer&#039;s classification was upheld and the residual objection under Chapter Note 5(E) was rejected. The analyzer mastersizer was accepted as laboratory equipment used for particle-size measurement and analysis, so classification under the residual heading was set aside in favour of the specific heading. The governing principle stated that a specific tariff description prevails over a residual entry when the goods squarely fit that description.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>