https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441431 In PMLA proceedings, habeas corpus is not maintainable once the arrestee has been produced before the Magistrate and remanded by a reasoned judicial order, because the detention is then judicial custody and the proper challenge lies to the remand order itself. Section 41A of the CrPC does not apply to arrests under the special enactment, which contains its own arrest safeguards and procedural scheme. Section 167 CrPC must be read harmoniously with that statute, so custody may be authorised during the investigation period and is not confined to the first 15 days in the narrow sense urged. Time affected by judicial hospital orders could not defeat the agency's custody entitlement. en-us Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 May 2026 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441431 In PMLA proceedings, habeas corpus is not maintainable once the arrestee has been produced before the Magistrate and remanded by a reasoned judicial order, because the detention is then judicial custody and the proper challenge lies to the remand order itself. Section 41A of the CrPC does not apply to arrests under the special enactment, which contains its own arrest safeguards and procedural scheme. Section 167 CrPC must be read harmoniously with that statute, so custody may be authorised during the investigation period and is not confined to the first 15 days in the narrow sense urged. Time affected by judicial hospital orders could not defeat the agency's custody entitlement. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441431