https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441431 The SC dismissed the appellant's appeals, upholding the impugned judgments. The respondents retained custody of the appellant until 12.08.2023. The appellant's writ of Habeas Corpus was deemed non-maintainable. Compliance with Section 19 of the PMLA, 2002, was confirmed. The interplay between Section 19 of the PMLA and Section 167 of the CrPC was clarified, affirming the applicability of Section 167(2) CrPC to PMLA arrests. The Anupam J. Kulkarni case decision was referred to a larger bench for reconsideration regarding the interpretation of Section 167(2) CrPC. Respondents' appeals were disposed of, and an intervention application was dismissed. en-us Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Sep 2024 18:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441431 The SC dismissed the appellant's appeals, upholding the impugned judgments. The respondents retained custody of the appellant until 12.08.2023. The appellant's writ of Habeas Corpus was deemed non-maintainable. Compliance with Section 19 of the PMLA, 2002, was confirmed. The interplay between Section 19 of the PMLA and Section 167 of the CrPC was clarified, affirming the applicability of Section 167(2) CrPC to PMLA arrests. The Anupam J. Kulkarni case decision was referred to a larger bench for reconsideration regarding the interpretation of Section 167(2) CrPC. Respondents' appeals were disposed of, and an intervention application was dismissed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441431