<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 405 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441426</link>
    <description>The penalties imposed on the appellants were found unsustainable by the Tribunal due to the retrospective application of Rule 26(2)(ii) and the lack of involvement in activities covered by Rule 26. As a result, the penalties were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 07:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 405 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441426</link>
      <description>The penalties imposed on the appellants were found unsustainable by the Tribunal due to the retrospective application of Rule 26(2)(ii) and the lack of involvement in activities covered by Rule 26. As a result, the penalties were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>