<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 402 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441423</link>
    <description>The HC applied the settled discharge standard under Sections 227, 239 and 240 CrPC, holding that the court must only see whether a prima facie case exists and cannot conduct a mini trial or assess the defence in detail. Revenue officers were alleged to have ordered mutation beyond the permissible extent in collusion with private developers and other accused. As the charge-sheet contained material suggesting connivance, the issue whether they acted in concert in ordering excess mutation was treated as a matter for trial. The revision petitions were therefore not allowed, and refusal to discharge was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 09:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 402 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441423</link>
      <description>The HC applied the settled discharge standard under Sections 227, 239 and 240 CrPC, holding that the court must only see whether a prima facie case exists and cannot conduct a mini trial or assess the defence in detail. Revenue officers were alleged to have ordered mutation beyond the permissible extent in collusion with private developers and other accused. As the charge-sheet contained material suggesting connivance, the issue whether they acted in concert in ordering excess mutation was treated as a matter for trial. The revision petitions were therefore not allowed, and refusal to discharge was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>