https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309044 The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of the property despite the legal presumption favoring the first defendant under the Benami Transaction Act. The plaintiff's claim for title declaration and injunction was rejected due to lack of legal basis and the sale to the second defendant being affected by lis pendens. The second defendant's purchase was deemed not bona fide as it was made during the pending suit without the original title deed. The District Court, Chengalpet, delivered the judgment on January 3, 2017, without awarding costs. en-us Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Aug 2023 21:07:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309044 The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of the property despite the legal presumption favoring the first defendant under the Benami Transaction Act. The plaintiff's claim for title declaration and injunction was rejected due to lack of legal basis and the sale to the second defendant being affected by lis pendens. The second defendant's purchase was deemed not bona fide as it was made during the pending suit without the original title deed. The District Court, Chengalpet, delivered the judgment on January 3, 2017, without awarding costs. Case-Laws Benami Property Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309044