<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2116 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309051</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and confirming the plaintiffs&#039; entitlement to the property based on the will dated 5th January 1973 and the reversionary rights decree. The court clarified that possession alone, without meeting the criteria under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, did not grant absolute ownership.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 21:07:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2116 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309051</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and confirming the plaintiffs&#039; entitlement to the property based on the will dated 5th January 1973 and the reversionary rights decree. The court clarified that possession alone, without meeting the criteria under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, did not grant absolute ownership.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>