<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1089 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309042</link>
    <description>Under the inherent power to prevent abuse of process, the Court held that at the discharge or quashing stage it is not to weigh evidence, but may interfere where the FIR, final report and accompanying materials do not disclose the alleged offence. On the prosecution materials, none of the appellants was shown to be connected with the offences, and the magistrate&#039;s reliance on stray case diary references was unjustified. The criminal proceedings were therefore not permitted to continue, and the impugned orders were set aside with discharge of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 16:58:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1089 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309042</link>
      <description>Under the inherent power to prevent abuse of process, the Court held that at the discharge or quashing stage it is not to weigh evidence, but may interfere where the FIR, final report and accompanying materials do not disclose the alleged offence. On the prosecution materials, none of the appellants was shown to be connected with the offences, and the magistrate&#039;s reliance on stray case diary references was unjustified. The criminal proceedings were therefore not permitted to continue, and the impugned orders were set aside with discharge of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>