https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309041 The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the HC's refusal to interfere with the trial court's order framing charges under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC. The Court held that available material sufficed at the charge-framing stage to infer abetment/instigation through conduct causing pressure and mental torture, and reiterated that mere angry words without intent do not constitute instigation. The SC noted the limited scope of revisional powers and clarified its observations would not prejudice the merits of the ongoing trial. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309041 The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the HC's refusal to interfere with the trial court's order framing charges under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC. The Court held that available material sufficed at the charge-framing stage to infer abetment/instigation through conduct causing pressure and mental torture, and reiterated that mere angry words without intent do not constitute instigation. The SC noted the limited scope of revisional powers and clarified its observations would not prejudice the merits of the ongoing trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309041