https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309041 For framing a charge of abetment of suicide, the court must see whether the materials, taken at face value, disclose grounds to presume instigation, conspiracy, or intentional aiding under Section 107 IPC; it is not required to decide whether conviction is ultimately likely. Applying that limited test, the material including the suicide note and investigation statements indicated pressure in connection with business transactions and share settlement, which was sufficient to support an inference of instigation at the charge stage. The charge under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC was therefore upheld, and interference in revision was declined. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309041 For framing a charge of abetment of suicide, the court must see whether the materials, taken at face value, disclose grounds to presume instigation, conspiracy, or intentional aiding under Section 107 IPC; it is not required to decide whether conviction is ultimately likely. Applying that limited test, the material including the suicide note and investigation statements indicated pressure in connection with business transactions and share settlement, which was sufficient to support an inference of instigation at the charge stage. The charge under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC was therefore upheld, and interference in revision was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309041