<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 965 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dropping of proceedings related to packing material cost based on Supreme Court precedent. The duty confirmation on clearances of freshly manufactured bottles against rejected duty paid bottles was upheld due to procedural violations, and the penalty imposition of Rs. 6.71 lakhs under Sec. 11AC was deemed valid. The appeals were disposed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 14:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=722001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 965 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dropping of proceedings related to packing material cost based on Supreme Court precedent. The duty confirmation on clearances of freshly manufactured bottles against rejected duty paid bottles was upheld due to procedural violations, and the penalty imposition of Rs. 6.71 lakhs under Sec. 11AC was deemed valid. The appeals were disposed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>