<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (8) TMI 222 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309037</link>
    <description>A preventive detention order is invalid where any material ground supplied to the detenu is so vague that it lacks essential particulars and prevents an effective representation under Article 22(5). The grounds must be read as a whole, and allegations without place, manner, or precise conduct were treated as defective; the order was vitiated on that basis. The order is also invalid where irrelevant allegations are taken into account by the detaining authority, because matters not showing conduct prejudicial to public order cannot support subjective satisfaction under the preventive detention statute. The detention was therefore held unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 13:12:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (8) TMI 222 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309037</link>
      <description>A preventive detention order is invalid where any material ground supplied to the detenu is so vague that it lacks essential particulars and prevents an effective representation under Article 22(5). The grounds must be read as a whole, and allegations without place, manner, or precise conduct were treated as defective; the order was vitiated on that basis. The order is also invalid where irrelevant allegations are taken into account by the detaining authority, because matters not showing conduct prejudicial to public order cannot support subjective satisfaction under the preventive detention statute. The detention was therefore held unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>