<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 133 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 75A, 77, and 76, as well as penalty enhancement by the Commissioner, in an appeal involving a Public Sector Undertaking bank&#039;s use of the MICR system for clearing cheques. The appellant&#039;s prompt payment post-clarification and lack of intent to evade tax, coupled with the ambiguity surrounding taxability resolved by a C.B.E.C. clarification, led to the invocation of Section 80. Consequently, penalties were waived, and the Tribunal upheld the service tax while annulling penalties sustained by the Commissioner (Appeals) and penalty enhancement in separate appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 133 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 75A, 77, and 76, as well as penalty enhancement by the Commissioner, in an appeal involving a Public Sector Undertaking bank&#039;s use of the MICR system for clearing cheques. The appellant&#039;s prompt payment post-clarification and lack of intent to evade tax, coupled with the ambiguity surrounding taxability resolved by a C.B.E.C. clarification, led to the invocation of Section 80. Consequently, penalties were waived, and the Tribunal upheld the service tax while annulling penalties sustained by the Commissioner (Appeals) and penalty enhancement in separate appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>