<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 360 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441381</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants, and restored the CB license, nullifying the penalty and forfeiture of the security deposit. The decision emphasized the lack of direct involvement of the appellants in the alleged violations and the failure to adhere to procedural timelines under CBLR, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 07:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 360 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441381</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants, and restored the CB license, nullifying the penalty and forfeiture of the security deposit. The decision emphasized the lack of direct involvement of the appellants in the alleged violations and the failure to adhere to procedural timelines under CBLR, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>