https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441375 The SC directed the Committee to reconsider the appellant's entitlement to a reward under the Ministry of Finance's policy, as the initial decision lacked reasoning. The appellant, initially sanctioned Rs. 5.50 lakhs, claimed entitlement to 20% of the evaded duty, amounting to Rs. 51.87 lakhs. The Committee had previously increased the reward to Rs. 9.45 lakhs without proper justification. The SC mandated a decision within six months, allowing for the possibility of additional payment with interest, partially modifying the HC's judgment and allowing the appeal without costs. en-us Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441375 The SC directed the Committee to reconsider the appellant's entitlement to a reward under the Ministry of Finance's policy, as the initial decision lacked reasoning. The appellant, initially sanctioned Rs. 5.50 lakhs, claimed entitlement to 20% of the evaded duty, amounting to Rs. 51.87 lakhs. The Committee had previously increased the reward to Rs. 9.45 lakhs without proper justification. The SC mandated a decision within six months, allowing for the possibility of additional payment with interest, partially modifying the HC's judgment and allowing the appeal without costs. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=441375