<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rejects Petitioner&#039;s Interest Claim Due to Misinterpretation of Refund Application Date; Order Deemed Incorrect.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71361</link>
    <description>Denial for petitioner’s claim for interest on refund sanctioned - Period beyond 3 months - The authority erred in holding that the petitioner’s letter dated 07.02.2023, requesting for processing its claims for refund is to be considered as its application for refund. - The impugned order is, ex facie, erroneous to the extent it rejects the petitioner’s claim for interest. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 07:26:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 22:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=721919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rejects Petitioner&#039;s Interest Claim Due to Misinterpretation of Refund Application Date; Order Deemed Incorrect.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71361</link>
      <description>Denial for petitioner’s claim for interest on refund sanctioned - Period beyond 3 months - The authority erred in holding that the petitioner’s letter dated 07.02.2023, requesting for processing its claims for refund is to be considered as its application for refund. - The impugned order is, ex facie, erroneous to the extent it rejects the petitioner’s claim for interest. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 07:26:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>